Simon Brew SimonBrew. Editor, author, writer, broadcaster, Costner fanatic. Now runs Film Stories Magazine. Skip to main content area. It's conventional to prosecute lies and mis-information. Where is the news on these developments in the Stewart women's case, it sounds more like a conventional type cover up. You seem to misunderstand how the American justice system works. It is not a crime to file a lawsuit based on false information, thus Stewart will not be charged with anything.
The way one is punished for a baseless lawsuit is by being made to pay the costs of the lawsuit. That's what happened in this case. Your article was untrue and should be retracted. Unconvential reporting requires credibility and you damage yours, and by reflection CCTV's, by not acknowledging the simple facts of this matter. I think your going over the top in your accusations, that I'm intentionally presenting untruths.
Now, I really need to approach this matter by going back to review the initial facts here. For me they started with becoming a member of CCTV, and you know I don't have to remind you of all the opportunities involved for members such as myself Seniors here at CCTV, and you too. Anyone can create an account on our website and begin contributing blogs, photos, and more that they believe to be relevant to the greater community.
You can't prove that it wasn't. Again, you must also remember that membership at CCTV, is not the same as it would be at a main stream convention media outlet. We CCTV are an alternative source of media for a diverse community population. Isn't that right. Are you a qualified specialist in critiquing members of alternate media or not? That's one of the reason, I think your going over the top with your criticism of me. Your conventional criticism of me won't work, as far my alternative media credibility is concerned.
CCTV is more of a self help educational type media, we are all students in learning, not paid conventional media types. The Terminator is in the middle of a movie rights shift as the franchise prepares for the release of Terminator: Dark Fate. The purpose of Terminator: Dark Fate would be to continue with the franchise through a new trilogy, but these plans came across with a big obstacle as the rights are about to go back to Gale Anne Hurd.
James Cameron came up with the concept for The Terminator after having a dream about a metallic torso holding kitchen knives and dragging itself from an explosion. He developed this idea as a slasher film, but after some rewrites and the help of screenwriter Bill Wisher, The Terminator as viewers know it came to be. However, Cameron was still an unknown director at the time, having Piranha II: The Spawning as his only directing credit, so studios were skeptical about him and his story about robots and time-travel.
Hurd suggested edits to the script and got a screenwriting credit, and Cameron got to direct his project. Even if countries agree to grant copyrights to AIs, the question of who gets them remains mysterious. Due to the current nature of copyright laws, there has to be a legal person in order to accept the grant on behalf of the AI. A patent is the exclusive right to an invention. This right is granted to anyone who has come up with a novel way of performing a certain action.
AI-powered systems are capable of performing various functions and even creating inventions. This is because their processing abilities are similar to the human brain. The main factor that will determine the validity of an invention is whether it can pass the patentability test.
In the case of AI-powered systems and technologies, this is the three steps test, the first one being the test for novelty. It is typically necessary for an inventor to thoroughly check the existing prior art to determine if his invention can be easily anticipated or not. While an AI system can gain access to prior art which can be fed by the equipped person, the question arises whether it is truly independent, let alone capable to make a judgment on whether or not its invention can account for something novel.
As far as the criteria of inventive step is concerned If the AI system is not able to determine the novelty of an idea, the chance of making innovations which are non-obvious to persons skilled in the art is very difficult. AI has the potential to invalidate the core legal principles that are the basis of Patent law.
The fundamental question that needs to be answered is whether AI-generated inventions should be granted protection under patent law. Some scholars believe that granting patent rights for AI-generated inventions could act as a catalyst to create new and advanced innovations that are difficult to come by through traditional means. Others, on the other hand, argue that granting such protection will increase the cost of doing research and development and impede innovation.
0コメント